Rhododendron pilosum

˂˂ forrige næste ˃˃

R. pilosum, (Menziesia pilosa). Foto: Don Hyatt
R. pilosum, (Menziesia pilosa) på Blue Ridge Parkway MP400. Foto: Hans Eiberg
R. pilosum, (Menziesia pilosa) noget gullig form Foto: Kristian Theqvist
R. pilosum, (Menziesia pilosa) 93/97 gullig form hos ORJ. Foto: Hans Eiberg
R. pilosum, (Menziesia pilosa). Hos Peter Hansen. Foto: Hans Eiberg
R. pilosum, (Menziesia pilosa). Hos Peter Hansen. Foto: Hans Eiberg
R. pilosum, (Menziesia pilosa). Hos Peter Hansen. Foto: Hans Eiberg
R. pilosum, (Menziesia pilosa). Hos Peter Hansen. Foto: Hans Eiberg
R. pilosum, (Menziesia pilosa). Foto: Mike Creel
R. pilosum, (Menziesia pilosa) hos OJL, stamme. Foto: Ole Jonny Larsen

R. pilosum (Menziesia pilosa). Abaxial leaf surfaces densely pilose, midvein scales narrowly oblong, lacerate or cleft; filaments glabrous; capsules densely stipitate-glandular; seeds brown, narrowly ovoid, ca. 1 mm including apiculuslike appendage of 0,1 mm; se United States.
Flora of North America

I was on Mount Mitchell in June and I think the plant you are seeing is called Minnie Bush, Menziesia pilosa. It is a member of the Ericaceae Family so it is closely related rhodos, azaleas, and blueberries. It has small, bell shaped flowers but nothing flashy. Cute, but often called “false azalea” because the foliage looks so similar to the natives. I’ll attach a photo I shot of a blossom from a plant up there. I was beside a rock, almost at the top of Mount Mitchell where the trail turns to go up to the new lookout tower.
Don Hyatt

 R. pilosum frø. Foto: Hans Eiberg


Flora of North America
Info


Craven, L.A. (2011). Diplarche and Menziesia transferred to Rhododendron (Ericaceae). Blumea 56: 33-35. (men det blev gjort før af H.Eiberg i 1996,1999, hvis man antager at R. camtschaticum er en Rhododendron)

Abstract:
The genera Diplarche and Menziesia have been shown to be nested in Rhododendron based upon cladistic analyses of DNA data. Morphologically, the differences between Diplarche and Menziesia are not so great that their inclusion in Rhododendron is inappropriate and the species of these two genera are formally transferred to Rhododendron. The following new names are proposed: R. benhalliiR. chamberlainiiR. goyozanenseR. × kamataeR. katsumataeR. kroniaeR. menziesiiR. menziesii subsp. glabellumR. multiflorumR. multiflorum forma bicolorR. multiflorum forma brevicalyxR. multiflorum var. purpureumR. pentandrumR. pilosumR. sophistarumR. yakushimense.

Carven artikel

Google Translate »